
April 9, 2009 – Delivering glittering, synth-tinged rock with attitude in all the right places, Shiny Toy Guns threw down an infectiously energetic set that brought the dance party to the sold-out crowd at the Pageant.














Photographer’s Notes:
I had the pleasure of photographing Shiny Toy Guns back in 2006, when the band opened for the Sounds in NYC. When I heard that the band was touring again, I knew it was time to throw down.
For this gig, Shiny Toy Guns certainly brought one of the more interesting lighting setups that I’ve seen, with LED arrays on either side of the stage, massive bursts from stage-mounted hazers, and cross-lighting for the lead singers. Add to this a little judicious use of flash from yours truly, and there’s a whole lot going on in front of the lens. This, of course, before we even factor in a well-tuned four-piece bringing the dance party.
For singer Chad Petree, the personal mini-spots on either side of him worked perfectly, as his duties on guitar and vocals kept him well in the beams of the lights.
Sisely Treasure, on the other hand, with no mic stand to keep her tethered, was a much more mercurial target, and flirted with the setup without really receiving the same well-intended benefit.
Mikey Martin on drums is such a kinetic force, I was a little disappointed that he was shrouded in thick haze for most of the shoot. Alright, and I admit, I’m kicking myself a little for not working him a little more, especially since he kit was setup right at the front of the stage.
Jeremy Dawson switched between synth and bass, and I found that he was easiest to photograph on the latter, for which he mostly rocked out at the back of the stage near the speaker stacks.
I shot this set with the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 and Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8, using the Nikon D3 and Nikon D700, respectively.
End Notes:
Big huge hug-out to my friend Bethany Watson. That is all.
This entry was posted on Thursday, April 9th, 2009 at 11:10 pm and is filed under Music Photography and tagged with Chad Petree, images, Jeremy Dawson, Mikey Martin, Music Photography, photography, pics, season of poison, shiny toy guns, Sisely Treasure, stg, tour, we are pilot. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Shooting Caitlin Rose and band before the Old 97s was a fantastic warm up, and a nice way to dust of…
Here’s a little preview from a recent shoot with my friends Option Control toward the end of l…
Today Adobe has released the beta version of Lightroom4, the successor to their popular image manage…
You’ve seen it before – weird, colored blobs in your photographs radiating outward from some…
About that time when I said about the megapixel war being over with the release of the Nikon D4 and …
Great pictures! The show was fun, although her vocals were a bit rough. Likely from all the jumping around.
Hey Mike,
Thanks for the comment, glad to hear you like the shots. Overall, I thought the band sounded great, though Siseley does have a different approach than Carah.
This is a stellar set, Todd! I love this band…looks like some crazy lighting!
Hey Keith,
Thanks for the feedback. Yeah, their album We Are Pilots is classic in my books. The lighting was pretty wild in parts, but made for some great effects. Thanks again.
You take awesome pictures!
When will the Morrissey photos be posted??? Can’t wait to see them! :)
Hey E, thanks very much. I’m waiting on the Morrissey shots for the time being, will post if I’m able!
Great work. The light shining through the haze adds an interesting look and atmosphere.
Hey Craig, thanks for the feedback! This show definitely had a unique setup – strong lighting from the sides, very little from the front or back.
Hi Todd,
Great work!
I was wondering if you used a flash for these pictures. If so, do you have some hints on how to use it while keeping the colours?
Thanx in advance.
ion
Hi,
Yes, I did use flash for some of these shots. In short, the trick to using flash is to set the camera’s exposure to the ambient and to set the flash exposure for the subject.
I really, really like your work, but why do you rely on slanting the camera so much? A 30-45 degree angle just disorients the viewer without adding anything other than gimmick. I feel if there were a really exciting moment, then it would better shine through if the camera weren’t tilted bizarrely, and if there weren’t a really exciting moment, then it might not have been worth uploading.
The pictures you have from normal vertical/horizontal tilts are pretty astounding. I just wish there were more of them.
I have to disagree with Taylor Hill.
While I do find some people overuse tilting (I have been guilty myself in the past) I don’t find the tilt in any of the images in this set the least distracting.
Also, is adding interest to an otherwise uninteresting subject using a photographic technique really such a bad thing? I kind of thought that was one of the whole reasons we as photographers take pictures. Looking at a subject in a new/interesting way is part of the whole joy of viewing images and in my opinion can hardly be construed as a “gimmick.”
The tilting has not bothered me, and many times, I think is part of the photos appeal. Shooting at the edge of the stage, it often seems you need some tilt to get a satisfying image without a monitor or stand in the way.
A question about flash. It seems “no flash” is an almost universal rule in performance photography. How do you get around that?
Personally not a very big fan of tilting myself. But i’ll stay my tongue on the topic. To each his own.
Agree with Kevin.
Overusing one single technique is never a good thing, but I don’t think thats the case here. Being aware of theories like the golden triangle certainly can make a difference between a decent photo and an amazing photo.
Rich – you get a 50mm f/1.4. If you want to get around not being able to use a flash by using a flash, you will get a publicist/performer/security guard’s foot in your ass. There’s really nothing you can’t shoot at f/1.4 3200 ISO. If you have a full-frame sensor, get the 85mm f/1.2
12 of the 14 pictures in this are tilted. It works very, very well in the 14th picture. I am not sure it adds to the other 11. That is overusing. Again, this guy is a very, very badass photographer. I just want an opinion of a guy that good as to why this would be done to 85% of shots.
Taylor, of course, and with a lot of stage lighting you don’t have to get that high in ISO or low in f-stop. Others, not so much. I was referencing Todd’s statement in No. 10 that he did use flash on some of these shots, and I noted he’s used it in other concert shots. So, I was curious as to how he got around the general “no flash” rules. ~ Rich
i’ll throw in my two cents on tilting, too. personally, i’ve always thought the use of the dutch angle is much more effective as a video technique. i don’t so much mind it in performance photography, but where i really think it’s awful is in wedding and portrait photography. in my own photography i’m pretty ocd about straight lines and such (the main reason i bought that type e screen for my d3), so i try to use that to my advantage (just like any other tool out there). ultimately it’s a wholly artistic decision, one which i usually choose not to take.
Received an interesting anti-tilting comment on a post — #11 on Shiny Toy Guns: http://is.gd/wC22 Seems like a good Q&A topic.