<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Avett Brothers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/07/01/the-avett-brothers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/07/01/the-avett-brothers/</link>
	<description>Music Photography, band portraits and promos from professional music photographer Todd Owyoung</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The Avett Brothers Performing At The Pageant, September 24, 2010 &#124; ishootshows.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/07/01/the-avett-brothers/#comment-133088</link>
		<dc:creator>The Avett Brothers Performing At The Pageant, September 24, 2010 &#124; ishootshows.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2173#comment-133088</guid>
		<description>[...] were one of the very first bands I ever photographed back in 2006, so when I heard that they were returning to the Pageant, I knew that I had to cover the show.  To top it all off, the Avett Bros came back to a sold-out [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] were one of the very first bands I ever photographed back in 2006, so when I heard that they were returning to the Pageant, I knew that I had to cover the show.  To top it all off, the Avett Bros came back to a sold-out [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/07/01/the-avett-brothers/#comment-69817</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2173#comment-69817</guid>
		<description>What a paradox of fast glass: great speed, but speed itself isn&#039;t valuable without precision. I was really hoping Canon would really nail the AF with the Mark II of that lens, though I hear it&#039;s better than the Mark I. 

With my f/2.8 lenses, I&#039;m shooting wide open the majority of the time. With my f/1.4 primes, I&#039;ll shoot between f/1.4 and f/1.8 or so. If I have the luxury of stopping down much more than that, I&#039;ll just start shooting with my zooms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a paradox of fast glass: great speed, but speed itself isn&#8217;t valuable without precision. I was really hoping Canon would really nail the AF with the Mark II of that lens, though I hear it&#8217;s better than the Mark I. </p>
<p>With my f/2.8 lenses, I&#8217;m shooting wide open the majority of the time. With my f/1.4 primes, I&#8217;ll shoot between f/1.4 and f/1.8 or so. If I have the luxury of stopping down much more than that, I&#8217;ll just start shooting with my zooms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Horton</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/07/01/the-avett-brothers/#comment-69816</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Horton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2173#comment-69816</guid>
		<description>One problem I encounter often when shooting wide open is the shallow DOF, where often a potentially great shot is ruined because I&#039;ll nail the guitarist&#039;s headstock perfectly but his face is blurred.  My favorite low light lens is the Canon 85mm f/1.2, which has a DOF measured in inches when cranked wide open. It has a slow AF due to the large amount of glass it has to move, so it can be very frustrating to see what I think is a great shot in the LCD of my Canon 50D, but when I open it in Photoshop the entire image is too soft to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One problem I encounter often when shooting wide open is the shallow DOF, where often a potentially great shot is ruined because I&#8217;ll nail the guitarist&#8217;s headstock perfectly but his face is blurred.  My favorite low light lens is the Canon 85mm f/1.2, which has a DOF measured in inches when cranked wide open. It has a slow AF due to the large amount of glass it has to move, so it can be very frustrating to see what I think is a great shot in the LCD of my Canon 50D, but when I open it in Photoshop the entire image is too soft to use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/07/01/the-avett-brothers/#comment-69788</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:55:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2173#comment-69788</guid>
		<description>Hi Claudio, 

Thanks for the comment. 

It&#039;s true; most all lenses improve with regard to sharpness and contrast when closed down one or two stops from maximum aperture. I generally shoot at maximum aperture with my zooms (f/2.8) for a few reasons. 

1) Light is often at a premium, so I prefer to get as much light as possible to the sensor while still maintaining reasonable shutter speeds.
2) The zooms I use are quite good at f/2.8. I have no question about their ability to deliver at max aperture.

The times I do stop down are when I&#039;m able to comfortably hit shutter speeds above 1/400 or so at an ISO of 1600. Aside from that, I&#039;d rather have lower ISO or higher shutter speeds. 

With my lenses, even on the D3 and D700, I&#039;d rather shoot at f/2.8 and ISO 1600 than f/4 and ISO 3200. Sharpness and contrast are not a concern for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Claudio, </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true; most all lenses improve with regard to sharpness and contrast when closed down one or two stops from maximum aperture. I generally shoot at maximum aperture with my zooms (f/2.8) for a few reasons. </p>
<p>1) Light is often at a premium, so I prefer to get as much light as possible to the sensor while still maintaining reasonable shutter speeds.<br />
2) The zooms I use are quite good at f/2.8. I have no question about their ability to deliver at max aperture.</p>
<p>The times I do stop down are when I&#8217;m able to comfortably hit shutter speeds above 1/400 or so at an ISO of 1600. Aside from that, I&#8217;d rather have lower ISO or higher shutter speeds. </p>
<p>With my lenses, even on the <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d3s" class="pretty-link-keyword">D3</a> and <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d700" class="pretty-link-keyword">D700</a>, I&#8217;d rather shoot at f/2.8 and ISO 1600 than f/4 and ISO 3200. Sharpness and contrast are not a concern for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudio</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/07/01/the-avett-brothers/#comment-69787</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2173#comment-69787</guid>
		<description>Hey Todd, nice pictures this ones. I like the differents moods on each one. 
A question, fast lens, like f/2.8 have better definition between f/5 and f/8 (in most cases, i guess that +1500 dlrs lens have a great definition in all apertures). Anyway, so, do you shoot in the biggest aperture possible? or do you close it a bit to get more definition and crank up the ISO?

That&#039;s  all for today, take care
Claudio</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Todd, nice pictures this ones. I like the differents moods on each one.<br />
A question, fast lens, like f/2.8 have better definition between f/5 and f/8 (in most cases, i guess that +1500 dlrs lens have a great definition in all apertures). Anyway, so, do you shoot in the biggest aperture possible? or do you close it a bit to get more definition and crank up the ISO?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s  all for today, take care<br />
Claudio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

