<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Converge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/10/19/converge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/10/19/converge/</link>
	<description>Music Photography, band portraits and promos from professional music photographer Todd Owyoung</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 18:32:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Images of Dethklock &#124; ishootshows.com</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/10/19/converge/#comment-74576</link>
		<dc:creator>Images of Dethklock &#124; ishootshows.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2677#comment-74576</guid>
		<description>[...] photographing Converge and Mastodon, I had my doubts about this tour&#8217;s lighting. While doing research for the Adult [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] photographing Converge and Mastodon, I had my doubts about this tour&#8217;s lighting. While doing research for the Adult [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/10/19/converge/#comment-74575</link>
		<dc:creator>wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2677#comment-74575</guid>
		<description>Thanks Todd. Time to go shoot n test. The D3 and D700 are using identical sensors no? 

In regards to RAW, It sounds like what you&#039;re saying is: the in-camera NR is just metadata applied to the display properties rather than altering actual image pixels. (ie WB) There&#039;s been some debate between my friends and I on how in-camera NR is handled while shooting in RAW.

Thanks for the Wisdom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Todd. Time to go shoot n test. The <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d3s" class="pretty-link-keyword">D3</a> and <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d700" class="pretty-link-keyword">D700</a> are using identical sensors no? </p>
<p>In regards to RAW, It sounds like what you&#8217;re saying is: the in-camera NR is just metadata applied to the display properties rather than altering actual image pixels. (ie WB) There&#8217;s been some debate between my friends and I on how in-camera NR is handled while shooting in RAW.</p>
<p>Thanks for the Wisdom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/10/19/converge/#comment-74559</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2677#comment-74559</guid>
		<description>Wilson, 
No, I don&#039;t reduce luminance noise for my images. For the reproduction sizes of my images, there isn&#039;t a need – the D3 offers a very fine &quot;grain&quot; and noise pattern, so I find that most any luminance noise basically disappears. This is true even for 20&quot; x 30&quot; prints I&#039;ve made from the D3. 

You can always turn off noise reduction in your RAW processor, so if you happen to shoot with it on in-camera, I wouldn&#039;t worry about it. I use Nikon Capture NX and Photoshop in my workflow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wilson,<br />
No, I don&#8217;t reduce luminance noise for my images. For the reproduction sizes of my images, there isn&#8217;t a need – the <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d3s" class="pretty-link-keyword">D3</a> offers a very fine &#8220;grain&#8221; and noise pattern, so I find that most any luminance noise basically disappears. This is true even for 20&#8243; x 30&#8243; prints I&#8217;ve made from the <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d3s" class="pretty-link-keyword">D3</a>. </p>
<p>You can always turn off noise reduction in your RAW processor, so if you happen to shoot with it on in-camera, I wouldn&#8217;t worry about it. I use Nikon Capture NX and Photoshop in my workflow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/10/19/converge/#comment-74526</link>
		<dc:creator>wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 00:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2677#comment-74526</guid>
		<description>&quot;I don’t reduce luminance noise with NN&quot;

At any point in your workflow do you reduce luminance noise? Is there a need? I am considering a copy of NN so I&#039;m gathering info. Also- It seems, after testing, that shooting RAW and using in cam NR, the actual pixels are being altered, or &#039;smeared&#039; for lack of a better word. Wouldn&#039;t this mean it is no longer a true RAW file, but an altered RAW file? I am shooting with a D700.

Do you handle ALL your post with only Capture NX2 and NN? I&#039;ve dabbled with NX2, but it&#039;s SO slow! Can you get such quality without help from Adobe? Wow</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I don’t reduce luminance noise with NN&#8221;</p>
<p>At any point in your workflow do you reduce luminance noise? Is there a need? I am considering a copy of NN so I&#8217;m gathering info. Also- It seems, after testing, that shooting RAW and using in cam NR, the actual pixels are being altered, or &#8216;smeared&#8217; for lack of a better word. Wouldn&#8217;t this mean it is no longer a true RAW file, but an altered RAW file? I am shooting with a <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d700" class="pretty-link-keyword">D700</a>.</p>
<p>Do you handle ALL your post with only Capture NX2 and NN? I&#8217;ve dabbled with NX2, but it&#8217;s SO slow! Can you get such quality without help from Adobe? Wow</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2009/10/19/converge/#comment-74558</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=2677#comment-74558</guid>
		<description>Hey Hilary, thanks for the support, I appreciate it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Hilary, thanks for the support, I appreciate it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

