Review: Nikon D600—The People’s Full-Frame DSLR


With the introduction of the Nikon D600, Nikon has delivered a full-frame DSLR at their lowest price yet for such a large sensor. More than that, the D600 delivers huge resolution and many of the features found in the Nikon D800 for nearly a third less the cash. In many ways, the D600 is the common person's full-frame DSLR.

While the $2,000 price tag is still high enough to keep it out of reach for many, the D600 is positioned as a highly capable image making machine, as long as a few bells and whistles from Nikon's flagships aren't to be missed.

The question is, at such an attractive price, does the D600 truly get the job done for the demanding photographer? Hit the full review to find out.

Key Features

  • 24.3MP Full-frame CMOS sensor (10.5MP DX-format crop mode)
  • ISO 100-6400 (expandable to ISO 50-25,600 equivalent)
  • Maximum 5.5fps continuous shooting
  • 39-point AF system with 9 cross-type AF points
  • 3.2in 921k-dot LCD screen
  • 1080p30 full HD video
  • Headphone jack for audio monitoring in movie mode
  • Uncompressed video recording via HDMI
  • Single-axis electronic level in viewfinder, duel-axis (pitch and roll) in live view
  • Dimensions: 141mm x 113mm x 82mm (5.5 × 4.4 × 3.2 in).
  • Weight: 760 g (1.6 lbs) (camera body only, no battery)

Support These Reviews

The Nikon D600 tested in this review was provided by B&H, where I personally buy all my camera gear. If you find this review helpful, please consider buying your next photo gear purchase from B&H,, or any of my other my affiliate links.

To learn how you can help support, visit the page Buy Yourself Something Nice. Now with that out of the way, let’s get to the review.

Where to Buy:

Nikon D600 at

Nikon D600 at

Body & Design

The body of the D600 will the Nikon D600 will be immediately familiar to anyone who has used one of Nikon's more recent DSLRs. Overall, the D600 is a bit like a cross between the D7100 and the D800, but much closer to the D7100 in size with almost identical controls.


As you can see from the 7 o'clock position on the lens mount, the D600 features a screw-driven focusing motor in the body, so it's capable of driving older AF-D lenses. You're not limited to only newer AF-S lenses, which opens up a lot more inexpensive used lenses—always a nice option.


The top panel is basically identical to that of the Nikon D7100—no surprises here. Unlike say the Nikon D800 or the Nikon D700, there are no dedicated controls on the top panel for WB, ISO or Image Quality. Those are set on the back panel of the camera.

One benefit to the mode dial on top of the camera is that if you change exposure modes frequently, there's a dedicated, hard control for that function.


The back of the D600 is laid out pretty much exactly like the Nikon D7100. Compares to the D800, controls for WB, Image Quality (JPG, RAW, etc), and ISO are moved to the back of the camera.


It's also worth noting that the D600 lacks a standard 10-pin remote socket for a remote shutter release, which means that it's just that more difficult to use those types of accessories. If you don't do any remote triggering, not an issue, but something to keep in mind.

In addition, the D600 lacks a standard PC sync socket. Again, not a huge issue if you shoot with a wireless trigger like Pocket Wizards or even a cheap Yongnuo RF-602, but not great news if you shoot wired in a studio.

Controls & Ergonomics

The D600 has a shutter release, two command dials (front and back) and a customizable AE-L/AF-L button. Basically everything you'd want or really need for customized manual shooting. This is a good start. The placement of these buttons is basically like any other upper-level Nikon DSLR, so anyone familiar with a D700, D6, D800, etc will feel right at home.


The main difference for Nikon D800 or D700 shooters will be the placement of the WB, Quality, and ISO buttons, which have been moved to the rear of the camera to make room for an exposure mode selector on the top of the camera. It's not a hugely detrimental change, but anyone used to looking for those functions on top of a camera will need to get used to the new arrangement.

While it's a smaller camera than the Nikon D800, if anything, there are those who may find the smaller grip of the D600 more comfortable. In addition, the body itself doesn't sacrifice enough surface area to affect button groupings in the negative.

What's more, the D600 is large enough to still balance well when using lenses like the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 or Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II.


Even coming from an older camera like the D700, the D600 is still similar enough to pick up and use without any special knowledge. However, there are some “gotchas” that are built in.

Is Stupid a Feature?

If there's one thing that provoked a little ire in the D600, it's the lack of customization in the controls. For whatever reason, Nikon has hardcoded some controls, such as the OK button in the center of the camera's back control pad. This is a button I normally set to zoom in to 100% in playback mode so its easy to check focus and sharpness, something a lot of photographers do. With the D600, you're forced into some awful in-camera processing menu, as if you wanted to Instagram your photos instead of process them in a sensible manner with Adobe Lightroom—which, frankly, is insulting.

What's even more infuriating is the fact that these picture controls already have a dedicated button on the back of the camera to the left of the LCD screen. This is pure stupidity. End rant.

Let's just hope Nikon allows customization of the center control pad “OK” button in the future.

Size Comparison

Who says size matters? The D600 is a smaller camera than the D700 or D800, but for the most part none of the added bulk is really missed. Here's a quick size comparison to the Nikon D800.

D600 on the left, D800 on the right.
nikon-d600-d800-comparison-review-nikon-d600-d800-comparison-review-5 nikon-d600-d800-comparison-review-6


As you can see, the D600 is noticeably smaller, but not so much to be ergonomically challenged compared to the larger D800. In fact, I personally found the D600 to be a bit more comfortable for my hands, even when balancing lenses like the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 and Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR II.


Shooting & Handling Impressions

Overall, the D600 handles very well. All controls commonly used for shooting are in a natural place if you use Nikon, and for the most part it's easy to access just about everything you want to. If you're used to shooting a camera like the D700 or D800, the placement of controls like WB, ISO, etc on the back of the camera is a change, but nothing close to a deal breaker.

Basically, the D600 handles like a Nikon. No real surprises, no real complaints—other than the aforementioned issue with customizing controls, zooming to 100% on playback, etc.

The viewfinder is 100%, and it's good. The only catch I found was that the viewfinder wasn't really 100% accurate. The captured image files in my review sample were shifted down about 5-10% from the viewfinder, meaning that a sliver at the top of the scene that I thought I may be composing for in the VF would get cut off, and I'd have a small unseen portion of the scene show up at the bottom of the capture. Not a huge deal, and perhaps unique to this copy, but somewhat annoying if you're a stickler for composition (which I am).

Camera Speed

In terms of speed, the D600 is noticeably faster than the D800. The 5.5 FPS vs 4 FPS really does make a difference in the feel of the responsiveness of the camera and its ability to render a useful burst mode.

While it's only 1.5 FPS faster, this difference seems pretty profound for real world shooting, enough so that the D600 feels more capable as an event photography camera than the D800. If I had to trade resolution for better framerate in a D800 body, I'd be very, very tempted to choose a faster framerate. The D600 essentially represents that compromise.

AF Performance: Speed & Precision

The AF of the Nikon D600 is solid. It feels fast and sure of itself. It doesn't hunt. And it's shockingly confident in low light. In fact, it almost feels as good as the AF on the D800. Almost. It's somewhat hard to pin down, but the D600 just doesn't feel quite as good as D800 with regard to AF.

The more tangible strike against the D600 is the tiny, nearly worthless spread of AF points clumped in the center of the viewfinder. It almost feels silly to change the position of the AF points, they're so close together—often it's faster to just focus and recompose, which is necessary most of the time anyway.


Overall Image Quality

Image quality on the new D600 seems really pretty excellent. You've got a super clean ISO 100 for your studio and controlled shooting, and high ISO quality that is fantastic right up to ISO 6400. All with a nice big, beautiful 24 megapixel resolution—enough to satisfy all but the most masochistic or demanding photographer.

No complains about the overall image quality of the D600. It's excellent.

High ISO Performance

Rather than bore you with some sort of contrived studio test, I thought that I'd just twist a few dials during a real live concert shoot and see what the D600 could do above ISO 1600.

The below are all 100% crops of this scene of Altantic Records recording artist Brett Eldredge opening for Taylor Swift on her 2013 RED tour.

Country music singer Brett Eldredge performing in support of Taylor Swift on the RED Tour 2013 at Scottrade Center in St. Louis on March 18, 2013. (Todd Owyoung)

ISO 3200


ISO 6400


ISO 12800


Technical details:

All above images and their crops were processed with Adobe Lightroom 4 from the RAW/NEF files. They have zero (0, zip, nada) luminance noise reduction, which is why you see that “grain” in them. They have a setting of 25 color noise reduction. I almost never apply luminance noise reduction unless I'm printing very large, because Lightroom does a very good job at rendering fine, innocuous-looking digital noise.

Given that there is no luminance noise reduction in the above samples, the grain you see in the above is pretty minimal.

High ISO Analysis

ISO 1600: Pretty damn perfect for this high resolution. If you could shoot at ISO 1600 all day long for event photography, you should be happy.

ISO 3200: A little more noise, but black levels are still excellent and shadows retain a good amount of depth.

ISO 6400: Black levels suffer and the shadows start to open up to luminance noise, but overall cover fidelity is excellent. You'll see plenty of luminance noise, but the image holds together very well. And given the extra resolution, the prominence of that digital noise will get pushed down as well in prints or downscaling.

ISO 12800 (HI-1): Now things get interesting. I threw in ISO 12800 as a lark, but the D600 delivered. Much better than the D3/D700 sensor generation, again, even with the 24mp count of the D600's sensor. Shadows are taken over by noise, and color fidelity takes a little bit of a hit, but the image still retains cohesion. This feels like at least a stop better than D3/D700 performance.

ISO 25600 (HI-2): Honestly, I didn't test this setting. At least for live music, generally any kind of lighting that actually requires you shoot at ISO 25600 is pretty awful lighting already. Not just in terms of quantity, but quality as well. If you need to shoot at ISO 25600, there's probably a good reason for it (read: it's an absolute necessity), in which case pixel peeping is probably not your main concern.

Additional High ISO Samples

Here's another couple samples — full frame image first, then a 100% crop with commentary.

 (Todd Owyoung)


The above is wide open with the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8. To my eyes, this performance is awesome. Blacks are black, the text on the amp is super crisp and contrast looks great. I could shoot at ISO 3200 with the D600 all day long.

 (Todd Owyoung)


This above image is ISO 3200 again. And again, we see some really nice performance from the D600. Yes, there's more noticeable luminance noise in the shadows, but detail is very nice for 24mp at this high sensitivity. Color fidelity is great. Also, consider this a nice test of the AF performance of the D600 as well, since this was an action shot.

If I had to pick an upper limit sweet spot for the D600 that balanced high sensitivity with image quality, I think I'd pick ISO 3200. But even ISO 6400 looks great as long as you aren't pixel peeping just for the same of it.

Overall High ISO Analysis

The D600 rocks at ISO settings higher than you can count. Next.

Image Samples

OK, let's make up for some of the pixel peeping above. Here are some real world images from the D600.

 (Todd Owyoung)

English singer-songwriter Ed Sheeran performing in support of Taylor Swift on the RED Tour 2013 at the Scottrade Center in St. Louis on March 18, 2013. (Todd Owyoung)

English singer-songwriter Ed Sheeran performing in support of Taylor Swift on the RED Tour 2013 at the Scottrade Center in St. Louis on March 18, 2013. (Todd Owyoung)

DIANA performing in support of Tegan and Sara at the Pageant in St. Louis on March10, 2013. (Todd Owyoung)

 (Todd Owyoung)

 (Todd Owyoung)

Taylor Swift performing on the RED Tour 2013 at the Scottrade Center in St. Louis, MO on March 18, 2013. (Todd Owyoung)

 (Todd Owyoung)

 (Todd Owyoung)

DIANA performing in support of Tegan and Sara at the Pageant in St. Louis on March10, 2013. (Todd Owyoung)

 (Todd Owyoung)

DIANA performing in support of Tegan and Sara at the Pageant in St. Louis on March10, 2013. (Todd Owyoung)

 (Todd Owyoung)

Country music singer Brett Eldredge performing in support of Taylor Swift on the RED Tour 2013 at Scottrade Center in St. Louis on March 18, 2013. (Todd Owyoung)

 (Todd Owyoung)

DIANA performing in support of Tegan and Sara at the Pageant in St. Louis on March10, 2013. (Todd Owyoung)

Who Should Buy This Camera?

I think that the target market for the D600 can be broken down into two main groups. Upgraders and Secondary shooters. There's also a third group, but we'll get to that.


The D600 represents the most affordable full-frame Nikon DSLR to date, which is not an insubstantial fact. At $2,000 USD, the D600 is as cheap as an entry into Nikon FX as you can get when buying new at this moment. And what do you get with a full-frame system? A much wider range of lenses specifically designed for full-frame, better high ISO performance (due to the pixel pitch), and wider dynamic range (again due to sensor design). Or maybe you're a DX shooter who just wants an excuse to buy a Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8 — the D600 is it.

Secondary Shooters:

The Nikon D600 packs enough image quality into its compact body to attract many photographers as an alternative to a Nikon D4 or D800. You still get a fantastic full-frame sensor just like the big guns, great video capability, and compatibility with all your lenses, all at a much lower price point. Maybe you want smaller files than your D800 for non-critical work, or maybe you want more resolution than your D4. All this makes the D600 a great compliment to anyone who already has an established Nikon system, but who may be looking for an economical way to add another body.


Finally, there is likely a third group of shooters, who, for lack of a better term, are the Downgraders. No, this might not be a popular notion to downgrade, but it makes it no less real a category.

Maybe you've had a Nikon D700 or a D3. The D800 offers a bit of overkill for what you shoot in terms of resolution, or maybe you just want to save some cash without sacrificing image quality. Or, maybe you're looking for the lightest, most compact full-frame Nikon DSLR that still offers huge image quality. I'm thinking travel or landscape photographers here. The D600 is a perfect fit. While the controls and customizability are a technically a “downgrade,” the addition of HD video, much improved live view modes, and a large increase in resolution are more than enough to make the D600 a great choice.

Summary and End Notes

The D600 is a camera that offers extremely capable image quality. The image quality is essentially everything you could ask for at this price point and more. A beautiful 24mp full-frame sensor with fantastic detail at base ISO and extremely good quality right up to ISO 12800. In many ways, the D600 may be Nikon's “best” full-frame DSLR to balance price and features.

The Nikon D600 a camera you might even imagine Galen Rowell using for its light weight and big image quality. At 24mp, the Nikon D600 offers more resolution that most people will ever truly use, but this camera also delivers amazing well at high ISO, especially compared to DX alternatives.

If image quality alone is your standard, the D600 is almost flawless. In a lot of ways, the D600 continues the tradition of the original, ground breaking Canon 5D. A fantastic sensor in a relatively affordable body without all the bells and whistles of the flagship models.

To this end, the Nikon's only real, minor failings are in its controls. The biggest catch for me was the lack of option to set the OK button on the control pad to zoom to 100%, and perhaps just one eccentric example of the limitations of the D600. Luckily, this feature to customize buttons could easily be added as a firmware update.

There is the issue of the small AF spread, but for most photographers, it's not a massive issue. Even for fast paced event photography, I found the AF system of the D600 quite satisfactory. While not as robust in feeling as the AF systems of the D4 or D800, the D600 definitely gets the job done.

Overall, the D600 is a fantastic combination of great image quality in an increasingly affordable package. It's easily a better buy than a used Nikon D700 for many photographers given the implementation of live view, increased resolution, and other advancements, even if it's technically not as “pro.” Aside from the layout of the controls and the strangely small AF spread in the viewfinder, the D600 could have easily been the upgrade many D700 users wanted instead of the slower overkill of the D800 and its über resolution sensor.

Or at the very least, in a world where image quality is king, the D600 deserves a crown.

Where to Buy:

Nikon D600 at

Nikon D600 at

My Camera DSLR and Lenses for Concert Photography

Nikon D750:
I use two Nikon D750 for my live music photography. Amazing high ISO performance in a compact body with tons of pro features.
nikon-24-70mm-f28-lens-squareNikon 24-70mm f/2.8:
For most gigs, the 24-70mm is my go-to lens. Exceptional image quality at wide apertures and super-functional range.
Nikon-70-200-squareNikon 70-200mm f/2.8 VR:
A perfect pair to the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8, I can basically shoot any job with the midrange and this lens. Superb image quality.
nikon-14-24mm-f28-lens-squareNikon 14-24mm f/2.8:
Ultra-wide perspective, ridiculously sharp even wide open at f/2.8. I love using this lens up-close and personal, where it excels.
More Gear Recommendations

Help Support

If this article or any other content on was helpful to you, please consider supporting this site and grabbing your next photo gear purchase through one of my affiliate links:

Simply clicking through any product links on this site helps me bring you free content like the photography tips and gear reviews regularly posted on, and naturally it doesn't cost you a cent more. 

There are 21 comments

Add yours
  1. Jason Stoff

    Nice review, Todd. We’ve got a D600 at Atomicdust, and I agree with every word here.

    The zoom in to 100% OK button and autofocus spread are my biggest gotchas, but I’ll be damned if that sensor isn’t fantastic. Might be my eyes, too, but the D600 seems to render skin tones better than my D700.

  2. Ken

    Great review Todd. I would agree with most of what you have written here. I have noticed however that the viewfinder on my D600 is considerably darker than my D7000. I would have expected it to be brighter being 100% coverage. I have also noticed that images shot with my 7000 are brighter and clearer than ones shot with the 600. Even with the same lens, ISO, aperture & shutter speed. My camera is currently at Nikon service for the dreaded oil spot problem. They are replacing the mirror and shutter so maybe there were other issues also. It is due back to me next week after almost 2 months with Nikon, so we will see if there is any improvement. I really hope so as I love the camera.

  3. Alex

    Thanks for your great real world review!
    Got my D600 back from service today… my body had some weird problems (cls not working, af had some problems…)
    May nikon did not take QA serious enough with this consumer dslr?!?

  4. Chris


    I was looking forward to your thoughts on the D600 in particular because you shoot concerts as I do. The thing that makes me hesitate most is the focus point areas. On my D700 I tend to use the focus points on the outer edges frequently (most of the time) and I tend to use continuous focus so I don’t do a lot of “focus and recompose” – especially when shooting on a long lens and wide aperture since the depth of field is so short.

    Did you find this prohibitively frustrating with the focus area on the D600?

    • Todd

      Hi Chris,

      I used continuous focus with the D600 and its outer focus points, and I found them adequate for my needs. Not ideal, but then again even the AF spread on the D800 and Nikon’s other FX cameras don’t have a fantastically wide area of coverage.

  5. Jason Waltman

    Hi Todd! Just wanted to say that I love reading your camera and lens reviews. They’re down-to-earth, to the point, and don’t involve pixel-peeping test charts. I like your “real world” shots, observations, and opinions. I bought the D600 back when it came out and agree with everything you say. The image quality is fantastic! I upgraded from a D300s looking to get more resolution and better quality images–especially in low light–but still keep a relatively light and cheap setup. I do wish Nikon wouldn’t have left out a few of the “pro” features found in the D4/D800 (51 pt AF, 1/8000th max shutter, more than 3 frames of bracketing, etc.) but overall, I’m happy with the compromises for the types of images I take and in the real world, those left out features haven’t made a bit of difference yet.

    I actually wrote about why I decided to upgrade my D300s to the D600 instead of waiting for another pro-level DX body on my blog here: Some of your readers thinking about upgrading may find it helpful.

  6. Carol Munhoz

    Hey Todd!
    I’m a very happy D600 owner since january. I’m in the group of the upgraders, I come from a six year old D60, so, I believe you can imagine how happy I am to finally upgrade to full frame. And the price of the D600 is incredible, specially because I always wanted a D700 but could never afford it. I use it with a basic 24-85mm (which came for free in a very good Christmas package!), but mostly I use it with a 50mm 1.4G, and it is amazing. I shoot concerts since 2006, but I can’t even begin to explain how happy I got after seeing the results of a concert shot with the D600. Incredible in low lights, amazing sharpness.
    Awesome review, man. And great shots, as usual! I’m your fan :)

  7. John

    Hi Todd,
    The D600 might be cheaper than other full format Nikons but it’s till out of my league.

    Are you planning a review of the D7100? or what do think of it as a possible replacement for a D300 low-noise concert wise?

  8. Greg

    Damn, that 128000 ISO example looks like 3200 ISO on my D7000. That’s more impressive than I expected from the “entry level” FF camera. Cool review, Todd!

  9. Robert Daniels

    Great review Todd. I too consider myself a downgrader. I came from a D300 to a D700. Four years later I’m replacing my shutter on D700 (at nikon as we speak) thus i’m looking for a new body to accompany my D700 until hopefully a replacement is introduced. Like you and many others I’m an event/concert photographer. I cannot afford a D4. Yet if ever really. Nonetheless the D600 has interested me. I like the results but hate ergonomics (big hands). Need of vertical grip is crucial to be carrying camera around during events. Both D800 and D600 have shallow grips. D4 is ideal for my hands not my wallet. D600 also is crippled with 1/4000th shutter speed. Not needed for most events but love to use it in bright sunlight to create silhouettes.
    Your comprehensive real world review has made me however reconsider and bypass the ergonomics to add this body to my arsenal so that I can start accepting wedding requests. ( I refuse to shoot weddings with one body) I will revisit the D600 at local camera store before making my decision.
    Thanking You sir,
    Robert Daniels
    Nikon|F5|D300|D700|16-35mm/f4|70-200mm/2.8 VR1|50mm/1.4|Sigma35mm/1.4|

  10. Dawood G

    Awesome review I personally prefer this camera and have been using it for some time, please share more reviews like this it would greatly help the newbies.

  11. Jerry A

    Outside of my day job (Location Manager TV/Film) I am the house photographer at a local venue. I was shooting with the D700 up until last year when I upgraded to the D800. While I love the picture quality, the frame rate was too slow for shooting shows. This year I added the D600 to my kit. The picture quality is great, the frame rate much quicker, and, the buffer doesn’t fill up as fast as the D800. I now use the D600 as my go to with a 24-70mm and the D800 with a 70-200. The only complaint I have about the D600 is that the auto focus (I feel) is not as good as the D800 in low light. Overall though I am glad I made the purchase. I’m no longer staring at a blinking green light (D800) while other shooters are getting the shot.

  12. Noah

    I just downgraded from a D800 to a D600 and I’m FURIOUS there is no zoom to 100% option. I found the D800s file too big to process efficiently, but the lack of ability to quickly check focus might be an even worse drawback.

    • Todd

      Noah, I hope Nikon fixes the zoom issue in a future firmware update. It’s just a small thing, but it’s kind of insulting, isn’t it?

Join in the Discussion