<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments for http://www.ishootshows.com</title> <atom:link href="http://www.ishootshows.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.ishootshows.com</link> <description>Music Photography, band portraits and promos from professional music photographer Todd Owyoung</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:27:46 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>Comment on Review: Yongnuo RF-602 Wireless Flash Triggers by Todd</title><link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2010/08/18/review-yongnuo-rf-602-wireless-flash-triggers/#comment-491134</link> <dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:27:46 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=4798#comment-491134</guid> <description>Hi Nancy,That combo should work just fine, though the max shutter speed with the RF-602 and the D800 may vary slightly. For example, you might not get 100% clean syncing at 1/250, but might need to drop down to 1/200, which is what I&#039;ve found with the Nikon D700 and D3.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nancy,</p><p>That combo should work just fine, though the max shutter speed with the <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/yongnuo-rf-602" class="pretty-link-keyword">RF-602</a> and the <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d800" class="pretty-link-keyword">D800</a> may vary slightly. For example, you might not get 100% clean syncing at 1/250, but might need to drop down to 1/200, which is what I&#8217;ve found with the <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d700" class="pretty-link-keyword">Nikon D700</a> and <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d3s" class="pretty-link-keyword">D3</a>.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on Review: Yongnuo RF-602 Wireless Flash Triggers by Nancy</title><link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2010/08/18/review-yongnuo-rf-602-wireless-flash-triggers/#comment-491132</link> <dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 22:10:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=4798#comment-491132</guid> <description>I just bought the Nikon D800 and I have the Yongnuo RF-602/N . Can anyone tell me if they will work together ?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just bought the <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/nikon-d800" class="pretty-link-keyword">Nikon D800</a> and I have the Yongnuo <a href="http://www.ishootshows.com/yongnuo-rf-602" class="pretty-link-keyword">RF-602</a>/N . Can anyone tell me if they will work together ?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on How to Shoot Better Concert Photos With A Point &amp; Shoot Camera by Cameron</title><link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2012/05/07/how-to-shoot-better-concert-photos-with-a-point-shoot-camera/#comment-491089</link> <dc:creator>Cameron</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 20:04:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://ishootshows.com/?p=9561#comment-491089</guid> <description>Even better (at least in price) might be the Olympus XZ-1. Similar one-stop variable aperture from f/1.8 to f/2.5, same 28-112mm zoom range. The only thing is its successor is probably on the horizon, so it might be wise to hold off until it hits the market or the XZ-1 sees a price drop.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even better (at least in price) might be the Olympus XZ-1. Similar one-stop variable aperture from f/1.8 to f/2.5, same 28-112mm zoom range. The only thing is its successor is probably on the horizon, so it might be wise to hold off until it hits the market or the XZ-1 sees a price drop.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The Best ISO To Use For Low Light Photography by brian</title><link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2012/05/15/low-light-photography-the-best-iso/#comment-491084</link> <dc:creator>brian</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:34:24 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootshows.com/?p=13030#comment-491084</guid> <description>Check out the EXIF data on Kathryn Yu&#039;s concert photography on flickr for some real world examples: http://www.flickr.com/photos/kathryn/collections/72157606327863281/It looks like ISO 5000 is about as far as she&#039;ll push her 5DmkII. The insight a little EXIF data gives you is fascinating.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the EXIF data on Kathryn Yu&#8217;s concert photography on flickr for some real world examples: <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/kathryn/collections/72157606327863281/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/kathryn/collections/72157606327863281/</a></p><p>It looks like ISO 5000 is about as far as she&#8217;ll push her 5DmkII. The insight a little EXIF data gives you is fascinating.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>Comment on The Best ISO To Use For Low Light Photography by Achmad Hafiyyan Faza</title><link>http://www.ishootshows.com/2012/05/15/low-light-photography-the-best-iso/#comment-491083</link> <dc:creator>Achmad Hafiyyan Faza</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 17:17:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ishootshows.com/?p=13030#comment-491083</guid> <description>Hey Todd,I&#039;m with you.High ISO in low light photography is still the best way. For me, no matter with noise, because music photography without noise is a flat image and stage photogrpahy isn&#039;t commercial photography with smooth image quality.May photographers better do art for himself, people, readers, and his subscribers, it&#039;s not just for himself. In my private observation, most people are more love with a bright photos.Okay, if you guys read this comment, don&#039;t blame me, I&#039;m not saying low ISO in music photography is bad. Just share and it back to your own taste. Cheers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Todd,</p><p>I&#8217;m with you.</p><p>High ISO in low light photography is still the best way. For me, no matter with noise, because music photography without noise is a flat image and stage photogrpahy isn&#8217;t commercial photography with smooth image quality.</p><p>May photographers better do art for himself, people, readers, and his subscribers, it&#8217;s not just for himself. In my private observation, most people are more love with a bright photos.</p><p>Okay, if you guys read this comment, don&#8217;t blame me, I&#8217;m not saying low ISO in music photography is bad. Just share and it back to your own taste. Cheers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Content Delivery Network via Rackspace Cloud Files: c14115981.r81.cf2.rackcdn.com

Served from: www.ishootshows.com @ 2012-05-17 01:54:59 -->
